Wednesday, May 20, 2009
47 Million Year Old Lemur Fossil
Please read article and watch video. Comment on your reaction. Please tie this into the evolution unit.
Christine McGourty takes a look at the beautifully preserved primate fossil
The beautifully preserved remains of a 47-million-year-old, lemur-like creature have been unveiled in the US.
The preservation is so good, it is possible to see the outline of its fur and even traces of its last meal.
The fossil, nicknamed Ida, is claimed to be a "missing link" between today's higher primates - monkeys, apes and humans - and more distant relatives.
But some independent experts, awaiting an opportunity to see the new fossil, are sceptical of the claim.
And they have been critical of the hype surrounding the presentation of Ida.
The fossil was launched amid great fanfare at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, by the city's mayor.
Although details of the fossil have only just been published in a scientific journal - PLoS One - there is already a TV documentary and book tie-in.
She belongs to the group from which higher primates and human beings developed but my impression is she is not on the direct line
Dr Jens Franzen
Ida was discovered in the 1980s in a fossil treasure-trove called Messel Pit, near Darmstadt in Germany. For much of the intervening period, it has been in a private collection.
The investigation of the fossil's significance was led by Jorn Hurum of the Natural History Museum in Oslo, Norway.
He said the fossil creature was "the closest thing we can get to a direct ancestor" and described the discovery as "a dream come true".
The female animal lived during an epoch in Earth history known as the Eocene, which was crucial for the development of early primates - and at first glance, Ida resembles a lemur.
But the creature lacks primitive features such as a so-called "toothcomb", a specialised feature in which the lower incisor and canine teeth are elongated, crowded together and projecting forward. She also lacks a special claw used for grooming
In a David Attenborough-narrated BBC programme, the fossil is revealed in virtual reality
The team concluded that she was not simply another lemur, but a new species. They have called her Darwinius masillae, to celebrate her place of origin and the bicentenary of the birth of Charles Darwin.
Dr Jens Franzen, an expert on the Messel Pit and a member of the team, described Ida as "like the Eighth Wonder of the World", because of the extraordinary completeness of the skeleton.
It was information "palaeontologists can normally only dream of", he said.
In addition, Ida bears "a close resemblance to ourselves" he said, with nails instead of claws, a grasping hand and an opposable thumb - like humans and some other primates. But he said some aspects of the teeth indicate she is not a direct ancestor - more of an "aunt" than a "grandmother".
"She belongs to the group from which higher primates and human beings developed but my impression is she is not on the direct line."
Independent experts are keen to see the new fossil but somewhat sceptical of any claim that it could be "a missing link".
Dr Henry Gee, a senior editor at the journal Nature, said the term itself was misleading and that the scientific community would need to evaluate its significance.
"It's extremely nice to have a new find and it will be well-studied," he said. But he added that it was not likely to be in the same league as major discoveries such as "Flores man" or feathered dinosaurs.
The BBC's Fergus Walsh takes a look inside the Messel Pit
Dr Chris Beard, curator of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History and author of The Hunt for the Dawn Monkey, said he was "awestruck" by the publicity machine surrounding the new fossil.
He argued that it could damage the popularisation of science if the creature was not all that it was hyped up to be.
Dr Beard has not yet seen scientific details of the find but said that it would be very nice to have a beautiful new fossil from the Eocene and that Ida would be "a welcome new addition" to the world of early primates.
But he added: "I would be absolutely dumbfounded if it turns out to be a potential ancestor to humans."
In the PLoS paper itself, the scientists do not actually claim the specimen represents a direct ancestor to us. But Dr Hurum believes that is exactly what Ida is.
He told BBC News that the key to proving this lay in the detail of the foot. The shape of a bone in the foot called the talus looks "almost anthropoid".
He said the team was now planning a 3D reconstruction of the foot which would prove this.
"We're not finished with this specimen yet," said Dr Hurum. "There will be plenty more papers coming out."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It will be an interesting story to follow, although it certanly seems to have sparked quite a bit of debate.
ReplyDeletei think its probably not the missing link because it has a tail and doesn't walk upright, but its definately a crucial discovery to proving the evolution theory.
ReplyDeletei think that it is a missing link of some sort even if it is not a direct ancestor of humans. I think this because as the artical said "the creature lacks primitive features such as a so-called 'toothcomb', a specialised feature in which the lower incisor and canine teeth are elongated, crowded together and projecting forward. She also lacks a special claw used for grooming". So that means that this creatuse was in the process of evolving away from being a lemor. There are probably manny missing links and think this might be one of them.
ReplyDeleteI'm going to disagree with Lizzie and say that it is an ancestor of humans, indirect maybe, but an ancestor nonetheless. Despite the fact that it has a tail, this could be something that grew smaller over the 47 million year period, and become a vestigal structure; last time I checked, I believe that humans have a "Tail-bone", which I don't think has any specific purpose.
ReplyDeleteI think that is pretty lucky that they were able to find a nearly intact skeleton in great condition. I definitely think that Ida is a missing link but just as the videos and article stressed, it is going to take more time to research to find exactly where Ida fits in and to see whether or not she is directly related to humans.
ReplyDeletei think it is really cool that the scientists will be able to study this fossil and learn from it and see if it really is an ancestor of ours
ReplyDeleteWhile it is exciting to find a fossil so intact, I do not believe it should be getting this much hype. While they are saying it is our ancestor, it is likely an indirect one that ties into the human evolutionary history but is not an extremely crucial part. We definately need a lot more research.
ReplyDeleteThis is so amazing!
ReplyDeleteI just saw this on GMA this morning and was totally shocked. I can't believe that a fossil from 47.8 million years ago is so complete and so similar to us. Although Ida isn't a direct ancestor of ours, her opposable thumbs, toe bones, teeth, fingernails (instead of claws), and human-like hands all have some connection to modern-day humans. I think that this discovery is definitely a 'missing link' that could help piece together ideas about evolution.
I do have to agree with Emily, though, that Ida will probably trigger some debate about evolution very soon.
This is a great discovery, that an almost completely intact fossil of a prehistoric lemur was found. It probably was some sort of ancestor to humans, but not in a direct way. Maybe this animal and the animal that was destined to evolve into humans at the time came from the same ancestor, or something like that. However, it does prove a significant aspect of evolution, that lemurs have adapted and evolved over time to get different traits.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I believe that this is a very important discovery, I personally do not believe in evolution. If I was to believe in evolution, however, I would think that it was in some way related to humans because of all of its similarites to humans, including the opposable thumbs and 'grasping hands'. Although it appears to be connected to humans, I agree with Hannah in saying that it is not an extremely crucial part to human history because it is most likely not a direct ancestor.
ReplyDeleteWell, it is indeed an interesting find. I do enjoy hearing about the variations of traits; as in the creature possessing both lemur-like and human-like qualities. I think I would support the idea that Derek mentioned that she did not, in fact, lead the way to humans, but perhaps was from the same common ancestor that evolved into similar species about the same time period that did.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, you may want to fix the time. I did not post that at 8:37. In fact, it is currently 11:38.
ReplyDeleteIt is pretty amazing that we have discovered (although back in the 80's) an essentially intact fossil. This "lemur", I believe, will bring some great studies into the field of evolution. If it IS an early ancestor of humans, which would make sense due to the teeth structure and lack of grooming bone, then we have a wide open window to study. Even if it isn't, it is still a prime example of survival-of-the-fittest. This primate had a bone structure that allowed it to swing and climb to get berries, but it was not able to hunt or protect itself from predators. Also, the structure was flimsy and the primate's wrist was broken, which is the believed cause of its death.
ReplyDeletediscovering a fossil that is still so perfectly in place is truly an amazing discovery, let alone knowing that it could possibly be the connection between human beings and other primates
ReplyDeleteI'm still curious why it took nearly 30 years for Ida to be really discovered. Nonetheless, this find is still very critical to the connection between primates and humans. This incredible find is one more puzzle piece towards completing the full picture of evolution. How ya like that metaphore?!
ReplyDeleteUh Oh! Where's Jimmy and Pratthew?
ReplyDeleteI find this discovery amazing. It is insane to think about the fact that this creatures fossil has stayed intact for over 47 million years. Also just the fact that we may be descended from this animal makes me realize how closely we are related to many animals on Earth.
ReplyDeleteI actually never said it wasn't an ancestor to humans, I just said it wasn't the missing link. There's not enough proof for that yet.
ReplyDeleteThis is a pretty cool discovery that helps prove evolution. I think it is probably a common ancestor because of some similar traits but I'm not sure if I believe it is a direct ancestor. It being 47 million years old allows a lot of time for adaptations so the fact that it doesn't seem closely related enough may be because it is so old.
ReplyDeleteDOUGLAS!!!
ReplyDelete